12-09-2014, 12:49 PM
Looking at dowel pins on the McMaster web site, they list a dimension for a 1/4" dowel as:
1/4" +.0001/+.0003
What does this mean?
Ed
1/4" +.0001/+.0003
What does this mean?
Ed
Dimensioning Question
|
12-09-2014, 12:49 PM
Looking at dowel pins on the McMaster web site, they list a dimension for a 1/4" dowel as:
1/4" +.0001/+.0003 What does this mean? Ed
12-09-2014, 12:55 PM
I'd take it to mean that the pins can be from .0001 to .0003 bigger then .250
dallen, proud to be a member of MetalworkingFun Forum since Apr 2012.
If life seems normal, your not going fast enough!
12-09-2014, 12:55 PM
Think it means they don't know how to write tolerances
Or they're proof reader isn't Steve.
Free advice is worth exactly what you payed for it.
Greg
12-09-2014, 12:59 PM
It's the tolerance. It can be larger (the +) by up to .0003, but might be only as large as .0001 more. So, the dowel will come to you at .2501 (smallest) to .2503 (largest) or anywhere in between.
This dowel is meant to be tightly fitting (I would classify this as a press fit) in an accurately drilled 1/4" hole.
Full of ideas, but slow to produce parts
12-09-2014, 02:45 PM
(12-09-2014, 12:59 PM)rleete Wrote: It's the tolerance. It can be larger (the +) by up to .0003, but might be only as large as .0001 more. So, the dowel will come to you at .2501 (smallest) to .2503 (largest) or anywhere in between. OK, that kind of makes some sense. Ed
12-09-2014, 06:58 PM
Dowel pins are always 2-3 tenths oversize so they fit snugly in a nominally sized hole. In reality though, you would ream the hole undersize for a good press fit, or oversize for a slip fit.
Tom (12-09-2014, 06:58 PM)TomG Wrote: Dowel pins are always 2-3 tenths oversize so they fit snugly in a nominally sized hole. In reality though, you would ream the hole undersize for a good press fit, or oversize for a slip fit. Agreed, but I didn't want to cloud the issue. I worked as a contractor for years. Some jobs lasted weeks, others months. Some (most?) places wanted you to specify the diameter and tolerance of holes. At the place I work currently, common practice is to specify the fit I want, and let the machinist determine the tolerances. Thus, the hole note reads, "light press fit for .250 dowel pin" They may drill, ream or swage the hole as they desire, as long as I get my fit. It works.
Full of ideas, but slow to produce parts
12-10-2014, 06:50 AM
Here's one example of where the "inch" (ANSI) system has it all over the metric (ISO) system.
I much prefer this method of writing the tolerance right there with the dimension. With the ISO shafts and holes tolerance system, you get a letter and numerical character pair for each, and it's hard to remember upper or lower case, which (shaft or hole) gets which, and what value is assigned to each. If you want to know the size, you have to go to a chart. As the range of diameter of the hole or shaft changes, the value of that alphanumeric character set changes too. How ingenious. Just put the dimension you need with the high and low limit right on the print please.
12-10-2014, 07:24 AM
Not only that I think the 'thou' is a nice unit to work with. Even though my machines are duel (mm & inch) I mainly work in thou's.
And for good reason, my compound slide dial is 1div= 1 thou, and metric 1div =0.03mm. Who can count in 3's ................... goodness me! One has to admit that is silly. DaveH
12-10-2014, 08:16 AM
(12-10-2014, 06:50 AM)PixMan Wrote: ...With the ISO shafts and holes tolerance system, you get a letter and numerical character pair for each, and it's hard to remember upper or lower case, which (shaft or hole) gets which, and what value is assigned to each. If you want to know the size, you have to go to a chart. As the range of diameter of the hole or shaft changes, the value of that alphanumeric character set changes too. How ingenious... (12-10-2014, 07:24 AM)DaveH Wrote: ...metric 1div =0.03mm. That is silly Dave. My friend's little lathe that (conveniently) resides in my shop has .001" and .02mm graduations. Tolerance is still something that I am not fully comfortable with. I must admit that when I watched Tom's latest videos it seemed very strange to hear him say a part was -0.000 and +0.003 and so he was aiming for something in the middle. Even stranger to hear him say that if the dimension was only to two decimal places he wouldn't even bother to take a final measurement. Of course, having him explain why made a lot of sense but it just seems strange when I have been trying really hard to nail a dimension exactly, when in hindsight, I probably didn't need to worry. I'd still like to see an actual video on it, as I think reading about it doesn't really do it for me on such topics.
Hunting American dentists since 2015.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|